I believe we are asking the wrong question(s) and possibly getting the wrong answer(s)! Doing so allows CCRC management teams to hide behind this issue (staffing problems in the restaurant industry), assuming it to will pass, things will return to pre-pandemic staffing patterns and there will harmony in the community. Meanwhile they hold onto their high profit business model where the dining charges are buried in the Resident Monthly fee while the residents are choosing to avoid all dining venues, if they can. This business model give even more profit to the for-profit partners (Erickson) of our not-for -profit CCRCs (WindCrest). They should not be allowed to hide behind the "Dining Industry staff shortages" problem, while reaping unearned revenue from the residents who are avoiding dining at all campus restaurants because of poor food quality and erratic service. Many residents here are cooking more meals in their residences, dining out or just not eating. Residents consider them to be preferable options to eating what is being currently offered in campus restaurants. To make matters worse they are still paying the $500.00 monthly charge for food that is built into the Resident Monthly Fee.
Restaurant industry staffing shortages are a fact of life and will be with us for a long, long time. Former restaurants have migrated to other jobs they find more preferable. Students are opting not to step up in numbers that prior generations did. These trends are affecting all CCRCs. The question that should be asked is what is the respective management teams of CCRCs doing to adapt to the demographic change while providing an essential service to those who truly need or want the service.
Could CCRCs managers reduce demand for dining services by revamping their dining policies and how they charge residents for them? I believe they could. If successful, it would free up dining staff resources (cooks, servers, support staff, etc.) to better meet the dining needs of those residents who truly need or want to return to the dining experience that existed pre-COVID.
Here is a proposal:
1.) Refund to residents monies paid for meal services that were not used since the post-pandemic period began.
2.) Allow residents temporarily opt-out of the required meal plan with a fair adjustment to the monthly fee.
3,) Offer residents a reduced (10/15/20) meal plan option priced identical to the charge per meal.
4.) Offer residents a honest and fairly priced ala carte dining option, with a "roll-over" feature.
All of these features will have the effect of reducing demand for dining services and therefore free up dining resources which can be allocated by management to meet the dining needs of residents who truly need or want them.